Slightly over-indulgent and about 30 min too long Django Unchained is nevertheless a great film and hugely enjoyable. Jamie Foxx is great as
It's another revenge story, but unlike Kill Bill the narrative is linear and more straightforward. Also unlike Kill Bill which is fairly fantastical, you could imagine many stories such as Django's actually happening when the Trans-Atlantic slave trade was at its height. As such I really felt the emotion as he was whipping one of his previous tormentors. But for all its portrayal of slavery in 19th century Southern States, (and violent revenge), there is a lot of humour. It's OK though, it doesn’t detract from the violence and swearing! If Sergio Leone was the first to show a gunshot and a man being killed in the same shot, then Tarantino has taken that to the next level with so much blood and lumps of flesh (from men and horses) flying about the place.
Unmistakably a Tarantino film, Django Unchained is really good, well written characters played by an excellent cast, and there is some wonderful photography giving a grand scale to the story. I just feel (and this is a very minor point) that with a tighter script and so a slightly shorter run time is would have been truly excellent.
I'm very much with you on the run time.
ReplyDeleteAye, otherwise it was extremely enjoyable.
DeleteHave read a lot of people had issues with the running time of this one. Think this is one of the few Tarantinos I didn't have that issue with. Thought it skipped along fairly well. Sure the third act succumbed to QT's usual violence-fest, but didn't matter too much to me. Really enjoyed this one.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed it too, and I didn't really mind the violence-fest; with so much invested in Django's character I was totally on board with everything he was dealing out.
Delete